10 min read

Testing components (with the 0dBm reference in mind)

I am testing some components that I plan to put into the 0dBm reference for which I now have an untested PCB.

I have the Digilent Analog discovery connected by USB and the “Impedance Analyzer” adapter. The components are soldered to small adapters with short leads soldered to fit into the analyzer adapter.f

Test fixture for smd capacitors and inductors
Test fixture for smd capacitors and inductors
Test fixture in the Analog Discovery with the impedance analyzer
Test fixture in the Analog Discovery with the impedance analyzer

4 capacitors

For DC-blocking in the 0dBm 10MHz reference, I have designed with 100nF capacitors (because I have a lot of them). But the quality of capacitors this large is not the same that you can get at lower capacitances, my capacitors at 100nF are either X7R or Y5-something (from a parts-kit). So my capacitors are (all 100nF):

  • C1: Samsung CL21B104KBNE, X7R, +/- 10%, 50V, 0805
  • C2: From an AIDETEK kit, X7R, +/- 10%, 50V, 0805
  • C3: From an AIDETEK kit, Y5?, +/- 20%, 50V, 0805
  • C4: Wurth, 885012207098, X7R, +/- 10%, 50V, 0805

I graph the impedance of the different parts

The resonances (lowest impedance) are at:

part frequency_hz impedance
C1 7491782 0.008438432
C2 6770266 0.024338478
C3 5757563 0.016789185
C4 7801478 0.011732717

So the Aidetek parts are clearly not as good. That the Y5 capacitor is worse is no surprise, but the X7R are also worse than the Wurth and Samsung parts. But for DC-blocking, they all seem ok. Here are the impedances at about 10MHz:

part impedance
C1 0.1275677
C2 0.1830315
C3 0.3039850
C4 0.1447502

3 Inductors

The low pass filter is a 7-th order Chebyshev filter intended to sit at 10.5MHz, and it relies on 1uH inductors. I have three different candidates:

  • L1: Kemet L0805C1R0KSMST, Shielded, Surface Mount Inductor, Ceramic Multilayer (0805).
  • L2: TDK MLZ2012A1R0WT000, Multilayer Ferrite (0805).
  • L3: A 1uH from an ebay sample book (0805).

Looking more closely at the values at higher frequencies, let’s look at the differences in impedance from an ideal inductor (which has \(X_L = 2\pi f L\)).

Here it is clear that there is a difference between the parts. The Kemet inductor (L1) is much better into the tens of MHz. The L2 (TDK) is made more to work as a Ferrite bead on power lines and such, and it is perhaps not so bad. The 1uH from the ebay sample book (L3) does not look as good.